Muhammadu
Buhari’s emergence as the opposition challenger ahead of next year’s polls has
set the stage for a keen contest. Buoyed by a morale-boosting primary win, and
with his street popularity now hitched to a well-oiled political machine, Buhari
has a firm base upon which to mount his fourth presidential bid.
For
sheer persistence, Buhari most resembles Obafemi Awolowo, who also serially
sought national leadership unsuccessfully. Like Buhari, Awolowo was of somewhat
ascetic bearing, Spartan self-discipline, inflexible will and dogged conviction
in his worthiness for high office. However, despite his intellectual and
administrative acumen, aspects of Awolowo’s political record undermined his chances
of national leadership. His political platform was deemed too provincial to
generate a national following. A similar limitation arguably accounted for
Buhari’s previous electoral failures.
Unable
to gainsay Buhari’s reputation for honesty, his adversaries have resorted to
the favoured tactic of smearing him as an ethnic and a religious extremist – a bogus
charge which endures because of some of Buhari’s own inopportune gaffes. This
time though, the politics of smear and fear is of limited utility. The incumbent
is running not only against Buhari but also against his own dismal presidential
record.
The
allegation that Buhari is a closet ethno-religious bigot is simply not borne
out by his record as Head of State. Though he and his deputy, Major General
Tunde Idiagbon, were both Muslims, they were favourably perceived by the
Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN). In his book, A Dangerous Awakening: The Politicization of Religion in Nigeria, Catholic
priest and scholar, Iheanyi Enwerem cites a 1988 publication by CAN’s northern
zonal chapter which hailed Buhari’s regime as the first to acknowledge “that
the North was not predominantly Islamic.” It also expressed satisfaction with
the fairness of Buhari’s political appointments and praised him for carrying
out his war against indiscipline “without fear or favour.”
Ironically,
Buhari’s most implacable opponent from the religious fold was the influential Islamic
cleric Sheikh Abubakar Gumi, who earned the regime’s wrath for opposing its
draconian punishment of Second Republic politicians. Arguably, the two
principal victims of Buhari’s ascent to power were northern Muslims – the deposed
President Shehu Shagari and his ally, Umaru Dikko, who very narrowly escaped being
abducted from Britain by the regime’s agents to stand trial at home.
Unlike
Awolowo who wrote prolifically, Buhari’s decades-long public career has yielded
little literature in his name outlining his ideas, convictions and policy
preferences. This literary deficit has aided the character assassins and
libelous hacks commissioned to defame him. But this gap is offset by the fact
that Buhari’s opponent is by no means a fecund intellectual colossus.
In
a 2002 essay, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi coined the term “Buharism” to capture the
ideals extrapolated from Buhari’s time as Head of State and argued that
Buharism is an ideology of bourgeois nationalism that aims to replace a
political economy dominated by parasitic elites beholden to global capital with
a new order in which a nationalist and productive class gains ascendancy. Buhari
certainly has the credentials to tackle elite impunity and the rent-seeking
political culture that is now in kleptomaniacal overdrive. Indeed, the persistent
slandering of Buhari as a bigot stems less from his occasional tin ear for
Nigeria’s polyphonic diversity than from kleptocrats’ fears of a certain
reckoning for their crimes should he clinch the presidency.
As
a battle-tested infantry corps veteran, Buhari will surely frontally confront the
terrorist insurgency that has killed conservatively over 9, 000 Nigerians,
displaced over 1.5 million more and claimed vast swathes of Nigerian territory.
As an officer who famously led a military incursion into Chad in pursuit of
rebels, he will be especially concerned by the institutional weaknesses that have
brought the armed forces into disrepute. Having crushed the Maitatsine insurgency as Head of State,
he will certainly bring a warrior’s resolve to the office of the
commander-in-chief. Regarding the key issues of security and corruption, Buhari’s
record is compelling.
Buhari’s
near obsessive focus on graft may be an insufficient critique of all that ails Nigeria
but his unequivocal anti-corruption stance is a welcome departure from the
incumbent’s bizarre insistence that corruption is not Nigeria’s problem or his much
lampooned attempt to articulate a little known distinction between corruption
and stealing. Buhari’s policy-lite deportment suggests that his main interest
is cleansing the Augean stables. Restoring propriety to public life is vital.
But his party has an impressive cast of policy wonks and its campaign battle
cry of security and jobs is gratifyingly current.
Buhari’s
support is more pan-Nigerian than in previous campaigns. Popular disgust with
the incumbent’s ineptitude competes favourably with whatever phobia for Buhari
that the ruling party can marshal. Opposing partisans have taken to feverishly
reminding Nigerians of Buhari’s previous failed candidacies. Their frenzied
negative attacks are telling. Rarely have so much time and effort been expended
to convince an electorate that an aged “serial loser” that supposedly has no
chance will lose again.
Those
who argued before the primaries for a younger opposition candidate than Buhari
(as I did) had a point. But clearly the incumbent is not an advertisement of
the radiant possibilities of youth. Given the available options, Buhari, warts
and all, is the viable alternative. The resort to a figure who last led Nigeria
thirty years ago indicates the scale of our predicament. That liberal elites
who ordinarily should be opposed to an ex-dictator have made common cause with
him suggests that we have reached that nadir at which extreme necessity sires
creative expediency. This may not be the contest we want but it is the contest
we deserve.
Images sourced from premiumtimesng.com and bellanaija.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment